Inner City Press/FFW: Watchdogging and Taking Action Since 1987

 

ICP/FFW Campaigns -::- In Other Media   For further information, click here to contact us.

For the Media
Community
Reinvestment
Bank Beat /Insurance
Freedom of Information
Human Rights
Current Campaigns
 

ICP's other studies of the 2004 HMDA data: first   second   third fourth fifth sixth

Some coverage:

“Citigroup Units Kept Making Loans That Violated Policy,” by Eric Dash, New York Times, May 4, 1005, Pg. C9

New York’s Minority Loan Practices Draw Interest: Bank data report reveals major rate disparity on city's home mortgages,” by Tom Fredrickson, Crain’s New York Business, May 2, 2005, Pg. 1

“Given Credit Where It’s Due,” New York Daily News (editorial, by Beverly Weintraub), May 2, 1005, Pg. 34

Royal Bank of Scotland Pursued by U.S. Consumers,” Dow Jones, May 1, 2005.

Spitzer Is Urged to Probe Royal Bank of Scotland,” by Dominic Rushe, Sunday Times (London), May 1, 2005

“New York's attorney general seeks data to assess whether lenders are targeting minorities,” by Annette Haddad, Los Angeles Times, April 29, 2005

“With New Data, Attorney General Looks at Mortgage Rates,” by Tami Luhby, New York Newsday, April 29, 2005

AP re ICP's first study  

 

How to Contact Us

Fair Finance Watch -- Detroit   February 5, 2006

   Fair Finance Watch has analyzed mortgage lending patterns in the Detroit Metropolitan Statistical Area in the most recent year for which data is available, 2004. Comparing the rate at which African Americans and whites were confined to higher cost mortgages over the federally-defined rate spread (of 3% over comparable Treasury securities on first lien loans, 5% on subordinate liens) are among the most disparate.

  At Bank of America, N.A., American Americans were over 26 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites;

At Citigroup's mortgage company, CitiMortgage Inc., American Americans were over 8.6 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites;

At Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., American Americans were over 7.2 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites, and Hispanics were over 2.8 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than non-Hispanic whites;

At Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., American Americans were over 6.7 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites, and Hispanics were over 2.9 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than non-Hispanic whites;

At Wachovia Mortgage, American Americans were over 3.1 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites.

    Several major regional banks were also among the most disparate:
At ABN Amro Mortgage Group, American Americans were over 13.2 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites, and Hispanics were over 7.8 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than non-Hispanic whites;

At Fifth Third Mortgage, American Americans were over 10.3 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites, and Hispanics were over 6.3 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than non-Hispanic whites;

At National City Mortgage, American Americans were over 7.9 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites, and Hispanics were over 4.2 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than non-Hispanic whites; and

At The Huntington National Bank, American Americans were over 4.1 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than whites, and Hispanics were a whopping 29 times more likely to be confined to higher cost loans than non-Hispanic whites.

    Significantly, in light of the $325 million predatory lending settlement announced Jan. 23, major  Super Bowl advertiser Ameriquest Mortgage in 2004 made 381 loans to African Americans in the Detroit MSA, 315 of them over the rate spread. Meanwhile, Ameriquest’s affiliate Argent Mortgage, which the state attorneys general left out of the settlement and reforms, made 2673 loans to African Americans in the Detroit MSA in 2004, 2142 of them over the rate spread. So the settlement covers less than 12.5% of ACC Capital Holdings’ loans to African Americans, and an even smaller percentage of ACC’s higher cost loans over the rate spread.

 Click here for FFW’s Ameriquest Watch.

A book on these topics, "Predatory Bender"   CL Review  order / Amazon

For further information, click here to contact us